Post by messi05 on Jan 24, 2024 5:51:11 GMT
Objectively for the damages caused to the consumer. Among the damage, he cited spending above the limit made by the kidnappers on his credit card and checking account. “As well as the respective charges added to these amounts in the renegotiation carried out by it, which must be declared unenforceable, with the respective refund of any amounts paid by the author, which must be determined during the settlement phase.” The original rapporteur of the case, judge Matheus Fontes, argued that the bank did not owe anything to the author of the action because it had nothing to do with the crime.
“There is no evidence that they were the result of poor Buy Phone Number List service provision, nor was the bank able to prevent it, considering that the operations resulted from the use of a credit card and its password,” he stated. He also highlighted that, as recorded in the police report, the author was kidnapped on the morning of September 11th and only reported the crime to the police in the early hours of the following day. “At that point, transactions had already been made with the card that he did not recognize. It is important to note that public security is the responsibility of the State and not the bank.”
What the adverse party and its patron attempt in this endeavor is to transform the Judiciary into a means for illicit enrichment,” stated Sky, in its petition. For judge Beatriz Alves Dias, the situation “is far from normal”, and that is why the MP needs to investigate the lawyer’s conduct. The decision is dated June 28th and the Goiás lawyer has already missed the deadline to appeal. Once the revisional demand is proposed, the statute of limitations for handling any actions on the initiative of the creditor is interrupted and suspended, until the decision to be handed down in the dispute filed by the creditor becomes final and unappealable. Borrower. 2. Regulatory appeal not granted…”. Based on the content of the aforementioned ruling, the position of the superior court and learned ministers (in large part) is assertive regarding the interruption of the statute of limitations for a collection action with the advent of the filing of the revisional action.
“There is no evidence that they were the result of poor Buy Phone Number List service provision, nor was the bank able to prevent it, considering that the operations resulted from the use of a credit card and its password,” he stated. He also highlighted that, as recorded in the police report, the author was kidnapped on the morning of September 11th and only reported the crime to the police in the early hours of the following day. “At that point, transactions had already been made with the card that he did not recognize. It is important to note that public security is the responsibility of the State and not the bank.”
What the adverse party and its patron attempt in this endeavor is to transform the Judiciary into a means for illicit enrichment,” stated Sky, in its petition. For judge Beatriz Alves Dias, the situation “is far from normal”, and that is why the MP needs to investigate the lawyer’s conduct. The decision is dated June 28th and the Goiás lawyer has already missed the deadline to appeal. Once the revisional demand is proposed, the statute of limitations for handling any actions on the initiative of the creditor is interrupted and suspended, until the decision to be handed down in the dispute filed by the creditor becomes final and unappealable. Borrower. 2. Regulatory appeal not granted…”. Based on the content of the aforementioned ruling, the position of the superior court and learned ministers (in large part) is assertive regarding the interruption of the statute of limitations for a collection action with the advent of the filing of the revisional action.